Masthead
Nov 2003

The eyes are still on the Chinese, who are parading their taikonaut Yang Liwei as a national hero. But the parades are a sideshow, and the real business is all about occupying space. This needs the help of the unmanned section of the Chinese space program, because the Chinese know relatively little about the weather up where they want to orbit their manned space station or stations. This is in the area their scientists call "geospace"; the magnetosphere, ionosphere, and the middle and upper parts of our atmosphere.


You might be surprised to hear that there is weather up there, but geospace is battered by fluctuations in the solar wind, and our Earth's magnetic field as well as atmospheric warming and even pollution. If the charged particles whizzing around up there get over-enthusiastic and pass through an orbiting manned station, those inside get a rather large dose of radiation. Predicting these things and knowing how much shielding you'll need is a vitally important piece of knowledge. So they're planning a raft of unmanned research satellites, increasing their launch rate to eleven over the next year. Two of these – the "DSP Satellites" – are specifically assigned to this monitoring task. One orbits the Earth over the poles, the other over the equator, both using eccentric orbits to cover areas where some data has previously been sketchy. The European Space Association (ESA) is joining in with some of the research, and it is interesting to note that ESA now has agreements in place to launch Soyuz rockets (like the one on the left) from their launchpads in Kourou , French Guiana where they can lift heavier payloads due to their proximity to the equator. This gives ESA a manned launch capability for the first time. Russia has also secured an EU-Russian partnership to improve the existing launchers and develop a reusable launcher in 2010.


The Chinese are using their Long March rocket for everything, so improvements developed during this increased launch activity will be applicable to their manned program, and economies of scale will apply to their rocket production lines. Interesting times indeed.


On the 6th November TransOrbital, my satellite launch company, managed to get a submission to the US Senate Science, Technology and Space subcommittee on the future of NASA. We hope to offer our services and some of the facilities of our TrailBlazer satellite (on the left). Other notables including Harrison Schmitt, the only scientist ever to walk on the moon, testified to try to persuade the US Senate to back a return to the moon. Reasons given include establishing a successor to the elderly Hubble telescope, transmitting solar power to Earth, and mining exotic materials not found down here like Helium3 which could provide a less dangerous form of nuclear power. Hopefully NASA will be spurred on, and TransOrbital hopes to be able to assist with the collection of lunar data. It is possible that President Bush may announce some formal plan to return to the moon on the 16th December, which is the 100th anniversary of the Wright Brothers' first flight at Kitty Hawk.


Also eyeing that date are some of the X-Prize contenders, who obviously think that it'd be a very auspicious date to put the first private craft into space. Xcor has fought their way through the regulatory federal hurdles designed to make sure American space entrepreneurs don't "jeopardize U.S. national security or foreign policy interests" and now has 180 days to launch in. Xcor have developed their prototype EZ-Rocket craft, but that has a maximum altitude of 3.2km; one of their proposals is this Xerus concept (in their artist's impression right) though it is not certain what they intend to launch.

Another entry has joined in the US$10m X-Prize, that of the High Altitude Research Corporation (HARC). Their entry is more along the lines of a conventional big-engined rocket, but both stages float back down on a parachute. It also looks relatively safe, launching over water and sporting an additional escape tower rocket. Now I know what I want for Christmas!


This edition is also on the web, just point your web browser to http://olliver.family.gen.nz.   vik@olliver.family.gen.nz
"
If voting could really change things, it would be illegal."

- Revolution Books, New York, New York.


Back to the Launchpad main page http://olliver.family.gen.nz/launchpad