Your news round-up from the big world of the incredibly small. November 2000 edition
Smalltalk Logo (C)2000 vik@family.gen.nz
Smalltalk Logo (C)2000 vik@family.gen.nz
Smalltalk Logo (C)2000 vik@family.gen.nzSmalltalk Logo (C)2000 vik@family.gen.nzSmalltalk Logo (C)2000 vik@family.gen.nz

Diamonds are what nanotechnologists really want to build their little machines from. We won't be able to see them, but they'll be used to make the devices that today are science fiction like medical micro-robots and microscopic computers. Here and today, devices have already been made from diamond (as reported in the March SmallTalk) but it has been hard going. We have the technology to carve diamond on a small scale, but only when it's nice and thin. Our thin diamond films have been made from relatively large crystals, and as our carving attempts split the film up along the crystal edges, our diamond creations to date have somewhat chunky margins.Diamond pipeBuilding from hard-wearing diamond is better than building little machines using silicon chip technologies because silicon just wears away too quickly. But we could carve silicon more accurately and so silicon Micro Electro-Mechanical Systems(MEMS) were the norm.
Dieter Gruen of the Argonne National Laboratory (who kindly supplied these pictures) and Alan Krauss have developed a way of converting "buckyballs" (balls of 60 carbon atoms) into a thin, regular diamond film with interlinked crystals only a few tens of atoms across. They can either be etched far more accurately than the older diamond films like the vernier calipers on the left, or can be grown over a silicon mould which is later dissolved. That's how the tube on the right was created. It is 5 thousandths of a millimetre across and has solid diamond walls only 300 nanometres thick. For his work, Gruen was presented with the MRS Medal award by the Materials Research Society. He has also made a significant progress towards making widespread micro- and nanoscale machines a reality.

80nm biomolecular motorPropellerheads

A team from the Montemagno Research Group at Cornell University has succeeded in making a very small motor indeed. By taking the proteins out of the wriggly bits on bacteria and clustering them around the shaft of a bent microscopic nickel wire, they can make the wire hoon around like a propeller at 8 revs a second. The protein bits sit atop a nickel post only 80nm in diameter, which is less than half the size of the smallest feature on the best Pentium computer chip. The whole thing is powered by the same chemical that the human body uses: ATP. The motors automagically self-assemble when the bits are mixed together, but out of 400 sets of bits only five worked. Room for improvement, A for effort. One day things like this will be whizzing around inside our cells, fixing us up, keeping us young, and curing hangovers.

Toughest At The Top Or Bottom?

There are two ways of making nanomachines: Start big and try to work down, or start with atoms and try to work up. Gruen's diamond films are an example of big things that make smaller bits. Chemists join atoms together in bulk, reacting beakers of chemicals to form more complicated chemicals, or occasionally noise, light and smoke.
But making just one atom react with another is tricky: Not only do you have to be very delicate, but you also have to see what you're doing. A tool called an AFM that senses the electricity conducted through a single atom can be used to find and move them one at a time. By pushing small molecule of carbon monoxide gas (the poison in car exhausts) around a firmly-anchored surface with iron in it, nanotechnology researchers have managed to make the carbon monoxide react with the iron.
making biphenyl from iodobenzeneBut in the last couple of months things have progressed to the point where German researchers have pushed around two little molecules of iodobenzene, broken their iodine tips off, and electrically welded the two big bits together with considerable accuracy to form a single molecule of biphenyl (used in these parts to preserve citrus fruits).
A ridge in an otherwise perfect copper surface is used to help hold the bits still in the same way that a welder uses a piece of firebrick to lean parts agains while welding them. As with the welder, it should be possible to flip the finished part around and weld on new bits at an angle to the original join to form a structure that extends in three dimensions. Alternatively, unwanted bits could be broken off a larger molecule to leave the shape we wanted. Most importantly, this shows to all the nay-sayers who claim that nanotechnology won't work because it's impossible the build molecules one at a time that they are plain wrong.
So as the people working from the bottom up make bigger bits, and the people working from the top down make more precise machines, the gap between the two fields gets smaller. Once they meet in the middle, lessons learned in the one field will be applied in the other and the rate of our progress and understanding will increase dramatically. This is why I believe that sophisticated nanotechnology devices like assembly tools and molecular computers will become a reality within a decade.

A Taste of The Future

A new buzzword is going around in boffin circles: 3D Printing. You might have seen it on those grisly medical TV shows where they call it 'stereolithography' and use it to make yellowy plastic models of distorted skulls from the image of a CAT scan.
It is a horrendously expensive process, but the yellow plastic stuff invented in 1984 is not the only way to do the job. Cheaper versions use a small industrial laser to cut shapes out of sticky paper, and then stick the layers together to make a 3D object out of something that looks and feels like fine-grained wood. There are even companies like Toybuilders (http://www.toybuilders.com) who will make toys, models, golf club heads, models of your unborn baby and anything else to your design.
More recently the humble inkjet printer has been drafted in to use thick inks and layer them one on top of another. By using some thick, water-based ink too, you can support delicate parts during production and then wash away the supports. You can use different coloured inks, metallic inks, inks with electrical properties to print circuits, chemicals to build medical tests on a card, batteries, MEMS, all kinds of weird stuff.
NASA and the US millitary have developed versions that print with clay 'slip' (muddy water to those of us who aren't potters) onto a hotplate. The hotplate dries the clay as it gets squirted out. Metal powder can be squirted in as well in varying proportions and the whole lot fired off in a kiln. You then end up with a part that is ceramic at one end and metal at the other. And you can make it in the back of a jeep, so you don't need to take all the spare parts for a tank into battle, or all the spares for a space station into space; just download the file from the internet and print it.
The cool part for us is that machines like this could be made for about NZ$3,000 with current technology, and you can bet that someone somewhere is working on that one. It's not as powerful as nanotech, but can you think of something to print with it?
http://olliver.family.gen.nz/launchpad 4th October 2000 vik@olliver.family.gen.nz
Back to the Launchpad Main Page